Friday 21 March 2014

Panic on Annuity Street ……

……..should be welcomed as it is actually a symptom of pensions policy coherence.  That it is temporarily uncomfortable for the traditional life offices is just another symptom of the emerging coherence.

While credit for the execution of pensions policy will be credited to the Lib Dems by thoughtful analysts, there is no doubt that cunning George has made some very smart moves around the fringes.  The Budget announcement is undoubtedly driven by middle-aged, middle England’s disenchantment with annuities.  If you have recently reviewed a communication from a life office prompting purchase of an annuity at the vesting date of a personal pension, you will understand this. 

The commentary predicting that hordes of decadent sixty-somethings will be blowing their pension pot on cruises and fast cars is frankly daft and, as usual, tends to underestimate the natural  prudence of this segment of the population. 
 
The coherent part of pensions policy is that we now have a universal, flat rate, state pension in place.  Other economies ~ notably Australia ~ got the compulsion to savings right without the necessary reform to means tested old age benefits.  
 
 So when the equity markets’ over-reactions have all settled, here’s what will actually happen:


1.      Annuities will still be purchased but later in old age than they are now.  Industry insiders will talk our friends and relatives through the concept of annuitizing in their early 70s and show them how to get value.


2.      In the first stage of pension decumulation we will remain invested albeit in a much more cautious manner with flexible drawdown being our method of taking income in combination with some paid work.
 

3.      The ability to take tax free cash more flexibly will mean that there will be clearing down of the tail of mortgage borrowing in the first phase of decumulation ~ hoovering scraps of DC and personal pensions into a good value SIPP gives one rather handy options at 55.
 
I am not a member of Osborne’s fan base - and often wonder who actually is - but you can’t deny that this is a tactically adept Budget from this most political of Chancellors. 

Thursday 6 March 2014

We've listened and responded - Long Term Absentee disclosure in group life



In November 2013 we took the decision to change our Long Term Absentee disclosure requirements.  It’s clear from your feedback that we got it wrong.  

In response to your criticism – what we called this in less politically correct times - we have now reverted back to requirements that only ask for information about current long term absentees.

Effective 6 March 2014, we will no longer ask for information about long term absentees who have returned to work but had periods of absence in the previous twelve months. This met with lots of resistance from your clients.   

We were determined to stop using ‘actively at work’ clauses on new or switching small schemes. That was well received and many of you agree that an approach that can transfer the risk even temporarily to the small corporate and their employee should be consigned to the past.

These are our new requirements for both new business and at rate review.

We will need to know about members who are currently absent through illness or accident if this has been:
·         for one week or longer in schemes with up to 50 members
·         for four weeks or longer in schemes with 51 to 500 members
·         for twelve weeks or longer in schemes with more than 500 members

Further information is available here.